TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide and tissue Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure
AU - Dokainish, Hisham
AU - Zoghbi, William A.
AU - Lakkis, Nasser M.
AU - Quiñones, Miguel A.
AU - Nagueh, Sherif
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004/5/1
Y1 - 2004/5/1
N2 - B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and early diastolic transmitral velocity/tissue Doppler mitral annular velocity (E/Ea) both estimate left ventricular filling pressure, but have not been compared in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). One hundred twenty-two hospital inpatients with suspected CHF underwent simultaneous clinical examination, BNP measurement, and comprehensive echo-Doppler examination. The accuracy of BNP and echocardiography was compared with the Framingham criteria diagnosis of CHF. Seventy patients (57%) had clinical CHF, whereas 52 (43%) did not. In all patients, the optimal BNP cutoff was >250 pg/ml (sensitivity 86%, specificity 77%). E/Ea >15 had 83% sensitivity and 82% specificity, whereas comprehensive echo-Doppler had 95% sensitivity and 88% specificity for CHF. In patients with normal ejection fraction, the optimal BNP cutoff was >150 pg/ml (sensitivity 79%, specificity 85%). E/Ea >15 had 79% sensitivity and 93% specificity, whereas comprehensive echo-Doppler had 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity for CHF. In patients with reduced ejection fraction, the optimal BNP cutoff was >300 pg/ml (sensitivity 88%, specificity 60%). E/Ea >15 had 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity, whereas comprehensive echo-Doppler had 96% sensitivity and 80% specificity (p = 0.08 compared with BNP) for CHF. Overall, BNP and E/Ea have similar diagnostic accuracy for CHF in this patient population. In patients with reduced ejection fraction, comprehensive echo-Doppler trended toward higher specificity than BNP for clinical CHF.
AB - B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and early diastolic transmitral velocity/tissue Doppler mitral annular velocity (E/Ea) both estimate left ventricular filling pressure, but have not been compared in the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF). One hundred twenty-two hospital inpatients with suspected CHF underwent simultaneous clinical examination, BNP measurement, and comprehensive echo-Doppler examination. The accuracy of BNP and echocardiography was compared with the Framingham criteria diagnosis of CHF. Seventy patients (57%) had clinical CHF, whereas 52 (43%) did not. In all patients, the optimal BNP cutoff was >250 pg/ml (sensitivity 86%, specificity 77%). E/Ea >15 had 83% sensitivity and 82% specificity, whereas comprehensive echo-Doppler had 95% sensitivity and 88% specificity for CHF. In patients with normal ejection fraction, the optimal BNP cutoff was >150 pg/ml (sensitivity 79%, specificity 85%). E/Ea >15 had 79% sensitivity and 93% specificity, whereas comprehensive echo-Doppler had 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity for CHF. In patients with reduced ejection fraction, the optimal BNP cutoff was >300 pg/ml (sensitivity 88%, specificity 60%). E/Ea >15 had 92% sensitivity and 72% specificity, whereas comprehensive echo-Doppler had 96% sensitivity and 80% specificity (p = 0.08 compared with BNP) for CHF. Overall, BNP and E/Ea have similar diagnostic accuracy for CHF in this patient population. In patients with reduced ejection fraction, comprehensive echo-Doppler trended toward higher specificity than BNP for clinical CHF.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942468005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942468005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.042
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 15110205
AN - SCOPUS:1942468005
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 93
SP - 1130
EP - 1135
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 9
ER -