TY - JOUR
T1 - Differentiating bipolar disorder from borderline personality disorder
T2 - Diagnostic accuracy of the difficulty in emotion regulation scale and personality inventory for DSM-5
AU - Fowler, James Chris
AU - Madan, Alok
AU - Allen, Jon G.
AU - Oldham, John M.
AU - Frueh, B. Christopher
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially supported by the McNair Medical Institute, Cullen Foundation, Brown Foundation, and Menninger Clinic Foundation. At the time of study design and data collection Dr. Oldham held the Barbara and Corbin Robertson Jr. Endowed Chair for Personality Disorders, Drs. Madan and Frueh were McNair Scholars. The study follows the guidelines on good publication practices. The study sponsors were not involved in any aspect of the research activities and did not approve the specific protocol or manuscript. Thus, the authors were independent from study sponsors in the context of the research. Drs. Fowler, Madan, Allen, Oldham, and Frueh have no conflicts of interest to report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/2/15
Y1 - 2019/2/15
N2 - Background: Confusion abounds when differentiating the diagnoses of bipolar disorder (BD) from borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study explored the relative clinical utility of affective instability and self-report personality trait measures for accurate identification of BD and BPD. Methods: Receiver operator characteristics and diagnostic efficiency statistics were calculated to ascertain the relative diagnostic efficiency of self-report measures. Inpatients with research-confirmed diagnoses of BD (n = 341) or BPD (n = 381) completed the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Results: The total score for DERS evidenced relatively poor accuracy for differentiating the disorders (AUC = 0.72, SE = 0.02, p <.0001), while subscales of affective instability measures yielded fair discrimination (AUC range = 0.70–0.59). The PID-5 BPD algorithm (consisting of emotional lability, anxiousness, separation insecurity, hostility, depressivity, impulsivity, and risk taking) evidenced moderate-to-excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.83, SE = 0.04, p <.0001) with a good balance of specificity (SP = 0.79) and sensitivity (SN = 0.77). Conclusion: Findings support the use of the PID-5 algorithm for differentiating BD from BPD. Furthermore, findings support the accuracy of the DSM-5 alternative model Criteria B trait constellation for differentiating these two disorders with overlapping features.
AB - Background: Confusion abounds when differentiating the diagnoses of bipolar disorder (BD) from borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study explored the relative clinical utility of affective instability and self-report personality trait measures for accurate identification of BD and BPD. Methods: Receiver operator characteristics and diagnostic efficiency statistics were calculated to ascertain the relative diagnostic efficiency of self-report measures. Inpatients with research-confirmed diagnoses of BD (n = 341) or BPD (n = 381) completed the Difficulty in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Results: The total score for DERS evidenced relatively poor accuracy for differentiating the disorders (AUC = 0.72, SE = 0.02, p <.0001), while subscales of affective instability measures yielded fair discrimination (AUC range = 0.70–0.59). The PID-5 BPD algorithm (consisting of emotional lability, anxiousness, separation insecurity, hostility, depressivity, impulsivity, and risk taking) evidenced moderate-to-excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.83, SE = 0.04, p <.0001) with a good balance of specificity (SP = 0.79) and sensitivity (SN = 0.77). Conclusion: Findings support the use of the PID-5 algorithm for differentiating BD from BPD. Furthermore, findings support the accuracy of the DSM-5 alternative model Criteria B trait constellation for differentiating these two disorders with overlapping features.
KW - Bipolar disorder
KW - Borderline personality disorder
KW - Diagnostic test
KW - Emotion dysregulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056761243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056761243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.079
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.079
M3 - Article
C2 - 30699870
AN - SCOPUS:85056761243
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 245
SP - 856
EP - 860
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -