TY - JOUR
T1 - Insufflationof carbon dioxide versus air during colonoscopy among pediatric patients
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Guacho, John Alexander Lata
AU - de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
AU - Ribeiro, Igor Braga
AU - de Moura, Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux
AU - Gallegos, Megui Marilia Mansilla
AU - McCarty, Thomas
AU - Toma, Ricardo Katsuya
AU - de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Background/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflation remains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate insufflation using CO2 versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients. Methods: Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane working methodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated for outcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure. Results: The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO2: n=178 versus air: n=180) were included in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO2 and air insufflation groups (mean difference, 10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lower in the CO2 group (risk difference [RD], -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure was similar (RD, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11). Conclusions: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO2 insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediately following the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results suggest that CO2 is a preferred insufflation technique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.
AB - Background/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflation remains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate insufflation using CO2 versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients. Methods: Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane working methodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated for outcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure. Results: The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO2: n=178 versus air: n=180) were included in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO2 and air insufflation groups (mean difference, 10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lower in the CO2 group (risk difference [RD], -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure was similar (RD, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11). Conclusions: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO2 insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediately following the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results suggest that CO2 is a preferred insufflation technique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.
KW - Air
KW - Carbon dioxide
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Pediatric
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104868385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104868385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5946/CE.2020.275
DO - 10.5946/CE.2020.275
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85104868385
SN - 2234-2400
VL - 54
SP - 242
EP - 249
JO - Clinical Endoscopy
JF - Clinical Endoscopy
IS - 2
ER -