Living donation decision making: Recipients' concerns and educational needs

Amy D. Waterman, Sara L. Stanley, Tonie Covelli, Erik Hazel, Barry A. Hong, Daniel C. Brennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

162 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context-Despite the advantages of living donor transplantation, evidence suggests that some potential recipients with living donors have psychological concerns that prevent them from pursuing living donation. Addressing these concerns through education may increase the rates of living donation.Objective- To understand the psychological barriers and educational needs of potential kidney recipients regarding living donation.Subjects and Design-Qualitative focus group study of kidney transplant recipients, donors, and family members to explore their assessment of the advantages of dialysis and deceased donor transplantation over living donation, their concerns about living donation, and what types of living donation education would be most helpful.Results-Kidney recipients reported that they might not pursue living donation because they felt guilty and indebted to the donor, did not want to harm or inconvenience the donor, did not want to accept a kidney that a family member might need later, and did not want to disappoint the donor if the kidney failed. Recipients were generally unaware that donors could personally benefit from donating and would rather wait for donor volunteers than ask anyone directly. Both donors and recipients thought that training on how to make the donation request and education about living donors' motivations for donation and transplant experience could help more renal patients pursue living donation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalProgress in Transplantation
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Living donation decision making: Recipients' concerns and educational needs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this