TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary care in extreme environments
T2 - Medical clinic utilization at Antarctic stations, 2013-2014
AU - Pattarini, James M.
AU - Scarborough, Jullian R.
AU - Lee Sombito, V.
AU - Parazynski, Scott E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Any opinion, finding, and conclusions expressed in this material are that of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors acknowledge the contribution of the health care providers at each of the Antarctic station clinics for their dedication to excellent medical care in the most extreme of environments. We also acknowledge the staff of the Center for Polar Medical Operations at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston for their steadfast service in the preventive care and medical screening of those who work at the bottom of the world. The authors would like to thank Dr James Cushman for his extensive review and organization of preliminary Antarctic clinic data prior to this report. Finally, we thank the Aerospace Medicine Residency Program at the University of Texas Medical Branch for their support and promotion of medical resident research and fieldwork in extreme environments.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Objectives The unique challenges posed by the Antarctic environment include both physiological and psychological stressors to the individual as well as the limited onsite medical capabilities available to address them. This report compares medical clinic utilization among 3 US Antarctic stations to identify differences in diagnostic frequency and utilization of clinic resources under current medical prescreening regimes for summer and winter seasons. Methods Clinic data from 3 Antarctic locations (McMurdo Station, Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, and Palmer Station) for the 2013-2014 Antarctic year were reviewed for patient encounter frequency by season, and provider-assigned visit diagnostic category. Differences between relative diagnosis frequencies among stations were analyzed, and per-capita clinic utilization was compared. Results The McMurdo clinic recorded 1555 patient encounters, with South Pole Station reporting 744 and Palmer with 128 encounters over the year. The most frequent reasons for clinic visits were orthopedic and dermatologic, with increased visits at McMurdo for respiratory illness and at the more remote locations for neurologic complaints and insomnia. Altitude-related visits were reported only at McMurdo and South Pole stations. Conclusions The clinic volume predictably correlated with station population. Insomnia and headache complaints, reported only at the South Pole Station, are likely associated with the increased elevation at that site, although they could be attributable to psychological stress from the isolated environment. Although the majority of cases could not be prevented with current screening, we suggest several changes to the current concept of operations that may decrease medical utilization and provide significant improvements to health care delivery on the ice.
AB - Objectives The unique challenges posed by the Antarctic environment include both physiological and psychological stressors to the individual as well as the limited onsite medical capabilities available to address them. This report compares medical clinic utilization among 3 US Antarctic stations to identify differences in diagnostic frequency and utilization of clinic resources under current medical prescreening regimes for summer and winter seasons. Methods Clinic data from 3 Antarctic locations (McMurdo Station, Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, and Palmer Station) for the 2013-2014 Antarctic year were reviewed for patient encounter frequency by season, and provider-assigned visit diagnostic category. Differences between relative diagnosis frequencies among stations were analyzed, and per-capita clinic utilization was compared. Results The McMurdo clinic recorded 1555 patient encounters, with South Pole Station reporting 744 and Palmer with 128 encounters over the year. The most frequent reasons for clinic visits were orthopedic and dermatologic, with increased visits at McMurdo for respiratory illness and at the more remote locations for neurologic complaints and insomnia. Altitude-related visits were reported only at McMurdo and South Pole stations. Conclusions The clinic volume predictably correlated with station population. Insomnia and headache complaints, reported only at the South Pole Station, are likely associated with the increased elevation at that site, although they could be attributable to psychological stress from the isolated environment. Although the majority of cases could not be prevented with current screening, we suggest several changes to the current concept of operations that may decrease medical utilization and provide significant improvements to health care delivery on the ice.
KW - Antarctica
KW - MEDEVAC
KW - South Pole
KW - altitude sickness
KW - austere environment
KW - isolation
KW - remote environment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959487104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959487104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wem.2015.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.wem.2015.11.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 26948556
AN - SCOPUS:84959487104
SN - 1080-6032
VL - 27
SP - 69
EP - 77
JO - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
JF - Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
IS - 1
ER -