Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol

Cynthia K. Perry, Rebecca Seguin-Fowler, Jay E. Maddock, Noah Lenstra, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Jessica Currier, Elena Andreyeva, Jim Winkle, Stewart G. Trost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Rural residents generally lack adequate physical activity to benefit health and reduce disparities in chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. The Socioecological Model describes physical activity as involving a dynamic and reciprocal interaction between individual, social, and community factors. Community group-based walking programs and civic engagement interventions aimed at enhancing physical activity have been successful in rural communities but have not targeted all three socioecological levels. Public libraries can act as innovative public health partners in rural communities. However, challenges remain because rural libraries often lack the capacity to implement evidence-based health promotion programming. The goals of this study are (1) build the capacity for rural libraries to implement evidence-based health promotion programs, (2) compare changes in physical activity between a group-based walking program and a combined group-based walking and civic engagement program with rural residents, and (3) conduct an implementation evaluation. Methods: We will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of a group-based walking (standard approach) versus a group-based walking plus civic engagement program (combined approach) aimed at enhancing walkability to increase physical activity among rural adults. Key mediators between the program effects and change in outcomes will also be identified. Finally, we will evaluate program implementation, conduct a cost effectiveness evaluation, and use a positive deviance analysis to understand experiences of high and low changers on key outcomes. Twenty towns will be matched and randomized to one of the two conditions and our aim is to enroll a total of 350–400 rural residents (15–20 per town). Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months. Discussion: This study will build the capacity of rural libraries to implement evidence-based walking programs as well as other health promotion programs in their communities. The study results will answer questions regarding the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two multilevel physical activity interventions targeting rural communities. We will learn what works and how these multilevel interventions can be implemented in rural populations. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05677906.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1895
Pages (from-to)1895
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2023

Keywords

  • Civic engagement
  • Comparative effectiveness trial
  • Physical activity
  • Rural
  • Walking
  • Exercise
  • Health Promotion/methods
  • Rural Population
  • Humans
  • Adult
  • Health Behavior
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this