Should All Patients Be Included in Alternative Payment Models for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Joshua C. Rozell, Paul M. Courtney, Jonathan R. Dattilo, Chia H. Wu, Gwo Chin Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Alternative payment models in total joint replacement incentivize cost effective health care delivery and reward reductions in length of stay (LOS), complications, and readmissions. If not adjusted for patient comorbidities, they may encourage restrictive access to health care. Methods We prospectively evaluated 802 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients evaluating comorbidities associated with increased LOS and readmissions. Results During this 9-month period, 115 patients (14.3%) required hospitalization >3 days and 16 (1.99%) were readmitted within 90 days. Univariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative narcotic use, heart failure, stroke, chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and liver disease were more likely to require hospitalization >3 days. In multivariate analysis, CKD and COPD were independent risk factors for LOS >3 days. A Charlson comorbidity index >5 points was associated with increased LOS and readmissions. Conclusion Patients with CKD, COPD, and Charlson comorbidity index >5 points should not be included in alternative payment model for THA and TKA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-49
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Keywords

  • alternative payment model
  • bundled payment
  • comorbidity
  • readmission
  • total joint arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should All Patients Be Included in Alternative Payment Models for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this