TY - JOUR
T1 - The development and validation of the speech quality instrument
AU - Chen, Stephanie Y.
AU - Griffin, Brianna M.
AU - Mancuso, Dean
AU - Shiau, Stephanie
AU - DiMattia, Michelle
AU - Cellum, Ilana
AU - Harvey Boyd, Kelly
AU - Prevoteau, Charlotte
AU - Kohlberg, Gavriel D.
AU - Spitzer, Jaclyn B.
AU - Lalwani, Anil K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Objective: Although speech perception tests are available to evaluate hearing, there is no standardized validated tool to quantify speech quality. The objective of this study is to develop a validated tool to measure quality of speech heard. Study Design: Prospective instrument validation study of 35 normal hearing adults recruited at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Participants listened to 44 speech clips of male/female voices reciting the Rainbow Passage. Speech clips included original and manipulated excerpts capturing goal qualities such as mechanical and garbled. Listeners rated clips on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) of 18 characteristics (e.g. cartoonish, garbled). Results: Skewed distribution analysis identified mean ratings in the upper and lower 2-point limits of the VAS (ratings of 8–10, 0–2, respectively); items with inconsistent responses were eliminated. The test was pruned to a final instrument of nine speech clips that clearly define qualities of interest: speech-like, male/female, cartoonish, echo-y, garbled, tinny, mechanical, rough, breathy, soothing, hoarse, like, pleasant, natural. Mean ratings were highest for original female clips (8.8) and lowest for not-speech manipulation (2.1). Factor analysis identified two subsets of characteristics: internal consistency demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 and 0.82 per subset. Test–retest reliability of total scores was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76. Conclusion: The Speech Quality Instrument (SQI) is a concise, valid tool for assessing speech quality as an indicator for hearing performance. SQI may be a valuable outcome measure for cochlear implant recipients who, despite achieving excellent speech perception, often experience poor speech quality. Level of Evidence: 2b. Laryngoscope, 128:1622–1627, 2018.
AB - Objective: Although speech perception tests are available to evaluate hearing, there is no standardized validated tool to quantify speech quality. The objective of this study is to develop a validated tool to measure quality of speech heard. Study Design: Prospective instrument validation study of 35 normal hearing adults recruited at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Participants listened to 44 speech clips of male/female voices reciting the Rainbow Passage. Speech clips included original and manipulated excerpts capturing goal qualities such as mechanical and garbled. Listeners rated clips on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) of 18 characteristics (e.g. cartoonish, garbled). Results: Skewed distribution analysis identified mean ratings in the upper and lower 2-point limits of the VAS (ratings of 8–10, 0–2, respectively); items with inconsistent responses were eliminated. The test was pruned to a final instrument of nine speech clips that clearly define qualities of interest: speech-like, male/female, cartoonish, echo-y, garbled, tinny, mechanical, rough, breathy, soothing, hoarse, like, pleasant, natural. Mean ratings were highest for original female clips (8.8) and lowest for not-speech manipulation (2.1). Factor analysis identified two subsets of characteristics: internal consistency demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 and 0.82 per subset. Test–retest reliability of total scores was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76. Conclusion: The Speech Quality Instrument (SQI) is a concise, valid tool for assessing speech quality as an indicator for hearing performance. SQI may be a valuable outcome measure for cochlear implant recipients who, despite achieving excellent speech perception, often experience poor speech quality. Level of Evidence: 2b. Laryngoscope, 128:1622–1627, 2018.
KW - Speech perception
KW - speech quality
KW - validated tool
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050599253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050599253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lary.27041
DO - 10.1002/lary.27041
M3 - Article
C2 - 29219185
AN - SCOPUS:85050599253
SN - 0023-852X
VL - 128
SP - 1622
EP - 1627
JO - Laryngoscope
JF - Laryngoscope
IS - 7
ER -