The development and validation of the speech quality instrument

Stephanie Y. Chen, Brianna M. Griffin, Dean Mancuso, Stephanie Shiau, Michelle DiMattia, Ilana Cellum, Kelly Harvey Boyd, Charlotte Prevoteau, Gavriel D. Kohlberg, Jaclyn B. Spitzer, Anil K. Lalwani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Although speech perception tests are available to evaluate hearing, there is no standardized validated tool to quantify speech quality. The objective of this study is to develop a validated tool to measure quality of speech heard. Study Design: Prospective instrument validation study of 35 normal hearing adults recruited at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Participants listened to 44 speech clips of male/female voices reciting the Rainbow Passage. Speech clips included original and manipulated excerpts capturing goal qualities such as mechanical and garbled. Listeners rated clips on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) of 18 characteristics (e.g. cartoonish, garbled). Results: Skewed distribution analysis identified mean ratings in the upper and lower 2-point limits of the VAS (ratings of 8–10, 0–2, respectively); items with inconsistent responses were eliminated. The test was pruned to a final instrument of nine speech clips that clearly define qualities of interest: speech-like, male/female, cartoonish, echo-y, garbled, tinny, mechanical, rough, breathy, soothing, hoarse, like, pleasant, natural. Mean ratings were highest for original female clips (8.8) and lowest for not-speech manipulation (2.1). Factor analysis identified two subsets of characteristics: internal consistency demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 and 0.82 per subset. Test–retest reliability of total scores was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76. Conclusion: The Speech Quality Instrument (SQI) is a concise, valid tool for assessing speech quality as an indicator for hearing performance. SQI may be a valuable outcome measure for cochlear implant recipients who, despite achieving excellent speech perception, often experience poor speech quality. Level of Evidence: 2b. Laryngoscope, 128:1622–1627, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1622-1627
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume128
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Speech perception
  • speech quality
  • validated tool

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The development and validation of the speech quality instrument'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this