TY - JOUR
T1 - The Society for Vascular Surgery Practice Guidelines
T2 - Management of the left subclavian artery with thoracic endovascular aortic repair
AU - Matsumura, Jon S.
AU - Lee, W. Anthony
AU - Mitchell, R. Scott
AU - Farber, Mark A.
AU - Murad, Mohammad Hassan
AU - Lumsden, Alan B.
AU - Greenberg, Roy K.
AU - Safi, Hazim J.
AU - Fairman, Ronald M.
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - The Society for Vascular Surgery pursued development of clinical practice guidelines for the management of the left subclavian artery with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In formulating clinical practice guidelines, the society selected a panel of experts and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. They used the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method to develop and present their recommendations. The overall quality of evidence was very low. The committee issued three recommendations. Recommendation 1: In patients who need elective TEVAR where achievement of a proximal seal necessitates coverage of the left subclavian artery, we suggest routine preoperative revascularization, despite the very low-quality evidence (GRADE 2, level C). Recommendation 2: In selected patients who have an anatomy that compromises perfusion to critical organs, routine preoperative LSA revascularization is strongly recommended, despite the very low-quality evidence (GRADE 1, level C). Recommendation 3: In patients who need urgent TEVAR for life-threatening acute aortic syndromes where achievement of a proximal seal necessitates coverage of the left subclavian artery, we suggest that revascularization should be individualized and addressed expectantly on the basis of anatomy, urgency, and availability of surgical expertise (GRADE 2, level C).
AB - The Society for Vascular Surgery pursued development of clinical practice guidelines for the management of the left subclavian artery with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In formulating clinical practice guidelines, the society selected a panel of experts and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. They used the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method to develop and present their recommendations. The overall quality of evidence was very low. The committee issued three recommendations. Recommendation 1: In patients who need elective TEVAR where achievement of a proximal seal necessitates coverage of the left subclavian artery, we suggest routine preoperative revascularization, despite the very low-quality evidence (GRADE 2, level C). Recommendation 2: In selected patients who have an anatomy that compromises perfusion to critical organs, routine preoperative LSA revascularization is strongly recommended, despite the very low-quality evidence (GRADE 1, level C). Recommendation 3: In patients who need urgent TEVAR for life-threatening acute aortic syndromes where achievement of a proximal seal necessitates coverage of the left subclavian artery, we suggest that revascularization should be individualized and addressed expectantly on the basis of anatomy, urgency, and availability of surgical expertise (GRADE 2, level C).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350519839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350519839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.090
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.090
M3 - Article
C2 - 19878791
AN - SCOPUS:70350519839
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 50
SP - 1155
EP - 1158
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery
IS - 5
ER -