TY - JOUR
T1 - Von Willebrand factor assay proficiency testing
T2 - The North American specialized coagulation laboratory association experience
AU - Chandler, Wayne L.
AU - Peerschke, Ellinor I.B.
AU - Castellone, Donna D.
AU - Meijer, Piet
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - We evaluated the accuracy and precision of von Willebrand disease (vWD) testing performed by up to 50 North American Specialty Coagulation Laboratories from 2004 through 2009, using proficiency samples from healthy subjects (n = 7) and patients with type 1 vWD (n = 7) or type 2 vWD (n = 3). We analyzed 2,212 submitted results. Precision was highest for von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen assays (coefficient of variation, 14%), which were performed predominantly by latex immunoassays, and lowest for ristocetin cofactor assays (coefficient of variation, 28%), which were increasingly replaced by collagen binding and immunofunctional methods during the 6-year evaluation period. Overall interpretation error rates ranged from 3% for normal samples, 28% for type 1 vWD, and 60% for type 2 vWD. Type 2 vWD samples were correctly identified by all laboratories using collagen binding/antigen ratios but by only one third of laboratories using ristocetin cofactor/antigen or immunofunctional/antigen ratios. In 2009, only 27% (12/45) of laboratories performed vWF multimer analysis, with error rates ranging from 7% to 22%.
AB - We evaluated the accuracy and precision of von Willebrand disease (vWD) testing performed by up to 50 North American Specialty Coagulation Laboratories from 2004 through 2009, using proficiency samples from healthy subjects (n = 7) and patients with type 1 vWD (n = 7) or type 2 vWD (n = 3). We analyzed 2,212 submitted results. Precision was highest for von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen assays (coefficient of variation, 14%), which were performed predominantly by latex immunoassays, and lowest for ristocetin cofactor assays (coefficient of variation, 28%), which were increasingly replaced by collagen binding and immunofunctional methods during the 6-year evaluation period. Overall interpretation error rates ranged from 3% for normal samples, 28% for type 1 vWD, and 60% for type 2 vWD. Type 2 vWD samples were correctly identified by all laboratories using collagen binding/antigen ratios but by only one third of laboratories using ristocetin cofactor/antigen or immunofunctional/antigen ratios. In 2009, only 27% (12/45) of laboratories performed vWF multimer analysis, with error rates ranging from 7% to 22%.
KW - Proficiency testing
KW - Von willebrand disease
KW - Von willebrand factor antigen assay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957686788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957686788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1309/AJCPH5JK4ONENPAE
DO - 10.1309/AJCPH5JK4ONENPAE
M3 - Article
C2 - 21571959
AN - SCOPUS:79957686788
SN - 0002-9173
VL - 135
SP - 862
EP - 869
JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology
IS - 6
ER -