A Lateral Expandable Cage with Independently Adjustable Anterior and Posterior Heights Can Improve the Pressure Distribution at the Cage-Endplate Interface: A Biomechanics Study

Jonathan Kusins, Scott Uyekawa, Gurpreet Singh, Yun Peng, Chase McQuarrie, Paul Holman, Ivan Cheng, Michael Jekir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the expansion trajectory of a lateral expandable cage affects pressure distribution at the cage-endplate interface under well-controlled biomechanical loading conditions.

METHODS: Three unique vertical height expansion trajectories used by clinically relevant lateral expandable cages were evaluated: craniocaudal, fixed-arc, and independently adjustable anterior and posterior height expansion. Two biomechanical loading scenarios were performed. The first scenario used custom bone foam test blocks to assess resultant pressure distribution at varying test block lordotic angles and expansion heights. The second scenario simulated expansion using synthetic spine units and compared the pressure distribution following expansion.

RESULTS: For an expandable cage with craniocaudal expansion, the pressure distribution at the cage-endplate interface was found to depend heavily on the lordotic angle of the test block (P < 0.001), but not expansion height (P = 0.634). The greatest maximum pressure occurred at higher test block lordotic angles. For an expandable cage with fixed-arc expansion, the pressure distribution shifted anteriorly throughout expansion. In the simulated expansion trials, an expandable cage with adjustable anterior and posterior height expansion was found to improve the pressure distribution at the cage-endplate interface, reducing the maximum pressure measurements by 22% and 14% in the craniocaudal and fixed-arc expansion, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Of the cage designs evaluated in this study, an expandable cage with independently adjustable anterior and posterior heights lowered the maximum pressure measured at the cage-endplate interface and alleviated the potential of cage edge loading, both of which are important considerations that are fundamental for a successful fusion procedure and the mitigation of implant subsidence risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e722-e731
JournalWorld neurosurgery
Volume181
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Edge loading
  • Expandable spinal fusion cage
  • Fusion
  • Lateral lumbar interbody fusion
  • Pressure distribution
  • Subsidence
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Humans
  • Prostheses and Implants
  • Lordosis
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • Spinal Fusion/methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Lateral Expandable Cage with Independently Adjustable Anterior and Posterior Heights Can Improve the Pressure Distribution at the Cage-Endplate Interface: A Biomechanics Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this