Aortic Regurgitation: Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of Review: The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) has advanced from physical examination and angiography towards evidence based non-invasive quantitative methods, primarily with echocardiography and more recently with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). This review highlights the guidelines and recent evidence in the diagnosis and management of AR; and outlines future areas of research. Recent Findings: Contemporary large cohorts of AR patients studied with echocardiography and CMR suggest that the left ventricular remodeling and systolic function triggers for intervention may be lower than previously recommended in the guidelines and emphasize the importance of LV volumes in risk stratification. Summary: Important gaps of knowledge in the quantitation of AR severity and patient risk stratification were fulfilled recently. Potential thresholds for intervention using ventricular volumes and CMR quantitative findings were recently described. The criteria for what constitutes hemodynamically significant AR and the optimal timing of intervention AR deserve further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1373-1380
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent Cardiology Reports
Volume25
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Aortic regurgitation
  • Aortic valve surgery
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance
  • Echocardiography
  • Management guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aortic Regurgitation: Review of the Diagnostic Criteria and the Management Guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this