Abstract
This essay critiques the fiercely utilitarian allocation scheme of Cameron et al. Children have no hope of recovery if their lives are cut short based on administrative protocols that misrepresent the nature of their conditions. Unilateral futility judgements - especially those based on a false predicate - are discriminatory. When considering the best interests of children, we should see possibility in disability and not advance ill-informed utilitarianism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 181-183 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Access to Care
- Disability Law
- Disorders of Consciousness
- Minimally Conscious State
- Pediatric Neurology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)