Effect of warfarin nonadherence on control of the International Normalized Ratio

Amy D. Waterman, Paul E. Milligan, Laura Bayer, Gerald A. Banet, Susan K. Gatchel, Brian F. Gage

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. The frequency and causes of aberrant International Normalized Ratios (INRs) in warfarin recipients and the percentage explainable by warfarin nonadherence were studied. Methods. The medical records of patients whose warfarin therapy was monitored by a telephone-based anticoagulation service in a Midwestern urban hospital between March 2000 and March 2001 were reviewed for causes of out-of-range INRs, the percentage of out-of-range INRs attributable to warfarin nonadherence, and demographic and clinical variables predictive of nonadherence. Results. Data from 347 patients were studied. The cohort yielded 4305 INRs, of which 1002 (23%) were out of range (lower than 1.8 or higher than 3.4). Thirty-six percent of the out-of-range INRs were due to warfarin or dietary nonadherence, 9% were due to medical systems problems (including drug interactions), 18% were due to a change in clinical status, and 38% were idiopathic. Age younger than 65 years, age greater than 80 years, and living closer to the laboratory were predictive of warfarin nonadherence. Conclusion. Warfarin nonadherence was the most common cause of explainable aberrant INRs in patients taking warfarin. Age younger than 65 years, age greater than 80 years, and living close to the laboratory were predictive of warfarin nonadherence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1258-1264
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Volume61
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2004

Keywords

  • Age
  • Anticoagulants
  • Compliance
  • Geriatrics
  • International Normalized Ratio
  • Patients
  • Warfarin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of warfarin nonadherence on control of the International Normalized Ratio'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this