Estimates and Temporal Trend for US Nationwide 30-Day Hospital Readmission among Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke

Arvind B. Bambhroliya, John P. Donnelly, Eric J. Thomas, Jon E. Tyson, Charles C. Miller, Louise D. McCullough, Sean I. Savitz, Farhaan S. Vahidy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Readmission reduction is linked to improved quality of care, saves cost, and is a desirable patient-centered outcome. Nationally representative readmission metrics for patients with stroke are unavailable to date. Such estimates are necessary for benchmarking performance. Objectives: To provide US nationwide estimates and a temporal trend for overall, planned, and potentially preventable 30-day hospital readmission among patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke; to investigate the association between hospitals' stroke discharge volume, teaching status, and 30-day readmission; and to highlight reasons for 30-day readmission and explore the association of 30-day readmission in terms of mortality, length of stay, and cost of care among patients with stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort, year-wise analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2015. The setting was a population-based cohort study providing national estimates of 30-day readmission. The database represents 50% of all US hospitalizations from 22 geographically dispersed states. Participants were adult (≥18 years) patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Hospitals were categorized by their annual stroke discharge volume and were classified as teaching hospitals if they had an American Medical Association-approved residency program or had a ratio of full-time equivalent interns and residents to beds of 0.25 or higher. Main Outcomes and Measures: Readmission was defined as any admission within 30 days of index hospitalization discharge. Using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-defined algorithms, events were classified as planned or unplanned and as potentially preventable. Results: Based on study criteria, 2078854 eligible patients were included (mean [SE] age, 70.02 [0.07] years; 51.9% female). Thirty-day readmission was highest for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (13.70%; 95% CI, 13.40%-13.99%), followed by patients with acute ischemic stroke (12.44%; 95% CI, 12.33%-12.55%) and patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (11.48%; 95% CI, 11.01%-11.96%). On average, there was a 3.3% annual decline in readmission between 2010 and 2014, which was statistically significant for the period of investigation (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.97). Patients discharged from nonteaching hospitals with high stroke discharge volume were at a significantly higher risk of 30-day readmission, and the top 2 reasons for readmission were acute cerebrovascular disease and septicemia. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that nationally representative readmission metrics can be used to benchmark hospitals' performance, and a temporal trend of 3.3% may be used to evaluate the effectiveness of readmission reduction strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere181190
JournalJAMA Network Open
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimates and Temporal Trend for US Nationwide 30-Day Hospital Readmission among Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this