Impact of Guideline-Directed Statin Intervention for Primary Prevention in Patients With Diabetes

Pallavi Muluk, Jianhui Zhu, Floyd Thoma, Eli Hay, Oscar Marroquin, Amber Makani, Aryan Aiyer, Khurram Nasir, Martha Gulati, Michael D. Shapiro, Suresh Mulukutla, Anum Saeed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We examined guideline-directed statin intensity (GDSI) use and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes in patients with diabetes across a contemporary health care system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients without preexisting ASCVD were categorized by diabetes status and 10-year ASCVD risk (borderline [5-7.4%], intermediate [7.5-19.9%], high [ ≥20%]). Mean \pm SD time to start of or change to GDSI was calculated. Incident ASCVD and allcause mortality association, stratified by ASCVD risk, was calculated using Cox regression. RESULTS Among 282,298 patients, 28,807 (10.2%) had diabetes and 253,491 (89.8%) did not. Only two-thirds of intermediate- and high-risk patients with diabetes were receiving GDSI therapy at 5-year follow-up. In fully adjusted models, patients with diabetes not taking a statin (vs. GDSI) had a significantly higher risk of stroke and mortality in the intermediate- and high-risk groups (hazard ratio for mortality 1.81 [95% Cl 1.58-2.07] vs. 1.41 [1.26-1.57]; P for interaction <0.01). CONCLUSIONS Significant gaps remain in GDSI use for high-risk patients with diabetes, conferring an increased risk of ASCVD outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2273-2277
Number of pages5
JournalDiabetes care
Volume46
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Guideline-Directed Statin Intervention for Primary Prevention in Patients With Diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this