Is flow diversion the death of cerebral bypass and coiling/stent-assisted coiling for giant cavernous aneurysms? A critical review on comparative outcomes and ongoing clinical trials

Tobias A. Mattei, Andrew S. Ferrell, Gavin W. Britz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The classic surgical treatment for symptomatic giant aneurysms originating from the cavernous segment of the carotid artery has been either microsurgical direct clip-reconstruction or carotid occlusion followed by additional cerebral bypass for those patients who fail in a balloon test occlusion. Nevertheless the emergence of new endovascular techniques, especially flow-diverting devices, has promised to revolutionize the treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms, possibly avoiding major microsurgical operations. In this review the authors summarize the current "state-of-art" of treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms, comparing the overall outcomes, complications, morbidity and mortality rates of new flow-diverting devices in relation to traditional microsurgical series.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-512
Number of pages8
JournalNeurosurgical Review
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Keywords

  • Cavernous sinus aneurysms
  • Clinical trials
  • Flow-diverting devices
  • Giant intracranial aneurysms
  • Pipeline device
  • Silk stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is flow diversion the death of cerebral bypass and coiling/stent-assisted coiling for giant cavernous aneurysms? A critical review on comparative outcomes and ongoing clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this