TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuroendovascular-specific engineering modifications to the CorPath GRX Robotic System
AU - Britz, Gavin W.
AU - Panesar, Sandip S.
AU - Falb, Peter
AU - Tomas, Johnny
AU - Desai, Virendra
AU - Lumsden, Alan
N1 - Funding Information:
Jeanne McAdara, PhD (Biolexica LLC, Longmont, CO), provided professional assistance with manuscript preparation, which was funded by Corindus, Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© AANS 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate new, neuroendovascular-specific engineering and software modifications to the CorPath GRX Robotic System for their ability to support safer and more effective cranial neurovascular interventions in a preclinical model. METHODS Active device fixation (ADF) control software, permitting automated manipulation of the guidewire relative to the microcatheter, and a modified drive cassette suitable for neuroendovascular instruments were the respective software and hardware modifications to the current CorPath GRX robot, which was cleared by the FDA for percutaneous coronary and peripheral vascular intervention. The authors then trialed the modified system in a live porcine model with simulated neuroendovascular pathology. Femoral access through the aortic arch to the common carotid artery was accomplished manually (without robotic assistance), and the remaining endovascular procedures were performed with robotic assistance. The system was tested for the enhanced ability to navigate and manipulate neurovascular-specific guidewires and microcatheters. The authors specifically evaluated the movement of the wire forward and backward during the advancement of the microcatheter. RESULTS Navigation of the rete mirabile and an induced aneurysm within the common carotid artery were successful. The active device fixation feature enabled independent advancement and retraction of the guidewire and working device relative to the microcatheter. When ADF was inactive, the mean forward motion of the guidewire was 5 mm and backward motion was 0 mm. When ADF was active, the mean forward motion of the guidewire was 0 mm and backward motion was 1.5 mm. The modifications made to the robotic cassette enabled the system to successfully manipulate the microcatheter and guidewire safely and in a manner more suited to neuroendovascular procedures than before. There were no occurrences of dissection, extravasation, or thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS The robotic system was originally designed to navigate and manipulate devices for cardiac and peripheral vascular intervention. The current modifications described here improved its utility for the more delicate and tortuous neurovascular environment. This will set the stage for the development of a neurovascular-specific robot.
AB - OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate new, neuroendovascular-specific engineering and software modifications to the CorPath GRX Robotic System for their ability to support safer and more effective cranial neurovascular interventions in a preclinical model. METHODS Active device fixation (ADF) control software, permitting automated manipulation of the guidewire relative to the microcatheter, and a modified drive cassette suitable for neuroendovascular instruments were the respective software and hardware modifications to the current CorPath GRX robot, which was cleared by the FDA for percutaneous coronary and peripheral vascular intervention. The authors then trialed the modified system in a live porcine model with simulated neuroendovascular pathology. Femoral access through the aortic arch to the common carotid artery was accomplished manually (without robotic assistance), and the remaining endovascular procedures were performed with robotic assistance. The system was tested for the enhanced ability to navigate and manipulate neurovascular-specific guidewires and microcatheters. The authors specifically evaluated the movement of the wire forward and backward during the advancement of the microcatheter. RESULTS Navigation of the rete mirabile and an induced aneurysm within the common carotid artery were successful. The active device fixation feature enabled independent advancement and retraction of the guidewire and working device relative to the microcatheter. When ADF was inactive, the mean forward motion of the guidewire was 5 mm and backward motion was 0 mm. When ADF was active, the mean forward motion of the guidewire was 0 mm and backward motion was 1.5 mm. The modifications made to the robotic cassette enabled the system to successfully manipulate the microcatheter and guidewire safely and in a manner more suited to neuroendovascular procedures than before. There were no occurrences of dissection, extravasation, or thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS The robotic system was originally designed to navigate and manipulate devices for cardiac and peripheral vascular intervention. The current modifications described here improved its utility for the more delicate and tortuous neurovascular environment. This will set the stage for the development of a neurovascular-specific robot.
KW - Cerebrovascular disorders
KW - Endovascular procedures
KW - Minimally invasive surgical procedures
KW - Robotic surgical procedures
KW - Therapeutic
KW - Vascular disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097184988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097184988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2019.9.JNS192113
DO - 10.3171/2019.9.JNS192113
M3 - Article
C2 - 31783367
AN - SCOPUS:85097184988
SN - 0022-3085
VL - 133
SP - 1830
EP - 1836
JO - Journal of Neurosurgery
JF - Journal of Neurosurgery
IS - 6
ER -