TY - JOUR
T1 - Neurosurgery certification in member societies of the world federation of neurosurgical societies (WFNS). the Americas
AU - Gasco, Jaime
AU - Barber, Sean M.
AU - Rangel-Castilla, Leonardo
AU - McCutcheon, Ian E.
AU - Black, Peter M.
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Introduction: This article aims to objectively compare the complexity and diversity of the certification process in neurologic surgery in member societies of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. Methods: This study centers on the certification processes in the geographic regions of North, South, and Central America. It presents a subgroup analysis based on the responses provided to a 13-item survey. The data received were analyzed and three Regional Complexity Scores (RCSs) were designed. To compare national board experience, eligibility requirements to access the certification process, and the degree to which exams were obligatory, an RCSOrganizational score was created (RCS-O, 20 points maximum). To analyze the complexity of the examination, an RCSComponents score was designed (RCS-C, 20 points maximum). The sum of both is presented as the Global RCS (RCS-G) score. In addition, a descriptive summary of the certification process for each responding society is also provided. Results: On the basis of the data provided by the RCS system, the United States and Brazil seem to have the most developed certification processes in the American continent (20 points each), followed by Canada (18 points) and Mexico (17 points). Conclusion: The experience from these leading countries should be of value and reference to other countries, allowing future improvement within the region. Peer-Review Article
AB - Introduction: This article aims to objectively compare the complexity and diversity of the certification process in neurologic surgery in member societies of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. Methods: This study centers on the certification processes in the geographic regions of North, South, and Central America. It presents a subgroup analysis based on the responses provided to a 13-item survey. The data received were analyzed and three Regional Complexity Scores (RCSs) were designed. To compare national board experience, eligibility requirements to access the certification process, and the degree to which exams were obligatory, an RCSOrganizational score was created (RCS-O, 20 points maximum). To analyze the complexity of the examination, an RCSComponents score was designed (RCS-C, 20 points maximum). The sum of both is presented as the Global RCS (RCS-G) score. In addition, a descriptive summary of the certification process for each responding society is also provided. Results: On the basis of the data provided by the RCS system, the United States and Brazil seem to have the most developed certification processes in the American continent (20 points each), followed by Canada (18 points) and Mexico (17 points). Conclusion: The experience from these leading countries should be of value and reference to other countries, allowing future improvement within the region. Peer-Review Article
KW - Latin America
KW - Neurosurgery certification
KW - Neurosurgery training
KW - North America
KW - WFNS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649306858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649306858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.01.012
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.01.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 21299979
AN - SCOPUS:78649306858
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 74
SP - 16
EP - 27
JO - World neurosurgery
JF - World neurosurgery
IS - 1
ER -