TY - JOUR
T1 - Periocular autografts in socket reconstruction
AU - Beaver, Hilary A.
AU - Patrinely, J. R.
AU - Holds, J. B.
AU - Soper, M. P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, and St. Louis University from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York. Reprint requests to James R. Patrinely, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, 6501 Fannin, NC-200, Houston, TX 77030.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Background: Current enucleation and socket reconstruction techniques often require reinforcement of an orbital implant or wound by the use of a tissue graft. Commonly, allograft tissue (cadaveric sclera, fascia, etc.) is used. Disadvantages of allografts include possible inflammatory reaction, unpredictable vascularization rate, variable resorption, antigenicity, and cost. Another alternative to implant reinforcement is autogenous tissue which usually is harvested from a remote site (fascia lata, split dermis, temporalis fascia, pericranium, etc.). An overlooked source of readily available autogenous grafts is the connective tissue in the periorbital region and the enucleated eye itself. These sources include autogenous lamellar sclera, the corneoscleral button, capsular tissue from a migrated implant, and orbital rim periosteum. Methods: The authors used periocular autografts in primary and secondary socket reconstructions in 24 patients, with excellent success over a 2-year period. Seven autogenous corneoscleral buttons and two autogenous scleral grafts were used to cover biointegrated implant spheres. Ten implant capsules from migrated nonintegrated spheres were used to cover and reinforce secondary implants. In five patients, an autogenous periosteal graft was taken from the supraorbital rim and used to cover an exposed implant. Results: Complications included one pyogenic granuloma, one conjunctival inclusion cyst, and one recurrent exposure after a periosteal graft, which necessitated explanation and a dermis fat graft. Postoperative motility was judged to be good to excellent in 21 patients. Conclusions: These techniques are presented as a new alternative to using human bank tissue or remote incision autografts for reconstruction of the anophthalmic socket.
AB - Background: Current enucleation and socket reconstruction techniques often require reinforcement of an orbital implant or wound by the use of a tissue graft. Commonly, allograft tissue (cadaveric sclera, fascia, etc.) is used. Disadvantages of allografts include possible inflammatory reaction, unpredictable vascularization rate, variable resorption, antigenicity, and cost. Another alternative to implant reinforcement is autogenous tissue which usually is harvested from a remote site (fascia lata, split dermis, temporalis fascia, pericranium, etc.). An overlooked source of readily available autogenous grafts is the connective tissue in the periorbital region and the enucleated eye itself. These sources include autogenous lamellar sclera, the corneoscleral button, capsular tissue from a migrated implant, and orbital rim periosteum. Methods: The authors used periocular autografts in primary and secondary socket reconstructions in 24 patients, with excellent success over a 2-year period. Seven autogenous corneoscleral buttons and two autogenous scleral grafts were used to cover biointegrated implant spheres. Ten implant capsules from migrated nonintegrated spheres were used to cover and reinforce secondary implants. In five patients, an autogenous periosteal graft was taken from the supraorbital rim and used to cover an exposed implant. Results: Complications included one pyogenic granuloma, one conjunctival inclusion cyst, and one recurrent exposure after a periosteal graft, which necessitated explanation and a dermis fat graft. Postoperative motility was judged to be good to excellent in 21 patients. Conclusions: These techniques are presented as a new alternative to using human bank tissue or remote incision autografts for reconstruction of the anophthalmic socket.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029843539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029843539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30477-6
DO - 10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30477-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 8841312
AN - SCOPUS:0029843539
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 103
SP - 1498
EP - 1502
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 9
ER -