TY - JOUR
T1 - Preclinical study testing feasibility and technical requirements for successful telerobotic long distance peripheral vascular intervention
AU - Legeza, Peter
AU - Sconzert, Kalyna
AU - Sungur, John Michael
AU - Loh, Thomas M.
AU - Britz, Gavin
AU - Lumsden, Alan
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by Corindus, A Siemens Healthineers Company. The authors would like to thank the Cardiac Catheterization Lab team at Houston Methodist, The Woodlands Hospital.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Robotic-assisted endovascular surgery enables us to perform interventions from long distances. This study evaluates the workflow and telecommunication requirements of telerobotic peripheral vascular interventions. Methods: Ten superficial femoral artery cases were performed by the operator being 44 miles away from the interventional suite, with an endovascular robotic system, on a high-fidelity endovascular simulator. Procedural success, technical success, fluoroscopy time, residual stenosis, contrast dose and network delay were registered. Communication success was assessed after each procedure on a scale from 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (ideal). Results: Procedural success and technical success were 100% and 80%, respectively. The mean residual stenosis, fluoroscopy time and contrast dose were 1.7 ± 5.25%, 6.5 ± 1.8 min and 58.8 ± 14.8 ml. The mean network latency was 38.9 ± 3.5 ms. Median communication success scores were 4.5 (min: 4, max: 5) reported by both the operator and the bedside technician on a scale of 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (ideal). Conclusion: With a stable network connection and good communication protocol, a high success rate was achieved for remote robotic-assisted peripheral vascular intervention in an ex vivo model.
AB - Background: Robotic-assisted endovascular surgery enables us to perform interventions from long distances. This study evaluates the workflow and telecommunication requirements of telerobotic peripheral vascular interventions. Methods: Ten superficial femoral artery cases were performed by the operator being 44 miles away from the interventional suite, with an endovascular robotic system, on a high-fidelity endovascular simulator. Procedural success, technical success, fluoroscopy time, residual stenosis, contrast dose and network delay were registered. Communication success was assessed after each procedure on a scale from 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (ideal). Results: Procedural success and technical success were 100% and 80%, respectively. The mean residual stenosis, fluoroscopy time and contrast dose were 1.7 ± 5.25%, 6.5 ± 1.8 min and 58.8 ± 14.8 ml. The mean network latency was 38.9 ± 3.5 ms. Median communication success scores were 4.5 (min: 4, max: 5) reported by both the operator and the bedside technician on a scale of 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (ideal). Conclusion: With a stable network connection and good communication protocol, a high success rate was achieved for remote robotic-assisted peripheral vascular intervention in an ex vivo model.
KW - CorPath
KW - endovascular
KW - peripheral vascular intervention
KW - remote intervention
KW - robotic-assisted and telerobotic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102613811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102613811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/rcs.2249
DO - 10.1002/rcs.2249
M3 - Article
C2 - 33634563
AN - SCOPUS:85102613811
SN - 1478-5951
VL - 17
JO - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
JF - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
IS - 3
M1 - e2249
ER -