TY - JOUR
T1 - Proposed Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Diagnose Intramural Haematoma and to Predict Aortic Healing after Acute Type B Aortic Syndrome
AU - Schwein, Adeline
AU - Khan, Mohammad
AU - Bennett, Matthew
AU - Chakfé, Nabil
AU - Lumsden, Alan B.
AU - Bismuth, Jean
AU - Shah, Dipan J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Objective: Type B acute aortic syndrome (AAS) encompasses aortic dissection (AD) and intramural haematoma (IMH), the diagnosis, evolution, and treatment of which are subject to controversies. The aim of this pilot investigation was to assess the ability of specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria to differentiate AD from IMH and predict optimal aortic remodeling following AAS. Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients presenting between 2008 and 2015 with type B AAS, who had diagnostic MRI following admission, were included. Three MRI criteria were proposed to identify IMH: (i) no visualised entry tear; (ii) no contrast uptake in the aortic lesion on the first pass angiographic run; (iii) no contrast uptake in the aortic lesion on the equilibrium phase T1 sequence. On each patient's diagnostic and follow up imaging studies, the volume of (i) false lumen/IMH, (ii) total aorta, and (iii) true lumen were calculated. Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the evolution of these volumes according to the presence or absence of the aforementioned criteria were compared. Results: Of 39 patients, in seven all MRI criteria were positive (group IMH) and 32 had one or more negative criteria (group AD). Patients with IMH and AD were similar with respect to sex, age, and delay between onset of symptoms and diagnostic and follow up imaging studies. Eighteen patients had a follow up imaging study after a mean period of 11.2 months: six in the IMH group and 12 in the AD group. Lesion volume decrease and relative true lumen volume increase were statistically significant in group IMH (p =.046 and p =.046, respectively), whereas there was a statistically significant increase of lesion volume (p =.008) in the AD group. Conclusion: This pilot study proposed three simple MRI criteria to differentiate between AD and IMH. Once prospectively and clinically validated, this could have substantial therapeutic benefits as IMH are likely to heal spontaneously.
AB - Objective: Type B acute aortic syndrome (AAS) encompasses aortic dissection (AD) and intramural haematoma (IMH), the diagnosis, evolution, and treatment of which are subject to controversies. The aim of this pilot investigation was to assess the ability of specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria to differentiate AD from IMH and predict optimal aortic remodeling following AAS. Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients presenting between 2008 and 2015 with type B AAS, who had diagnostic MRI following admission, were included. Three MRI criteria were proposed to identify IMH: (i) no visualised entry tear; (ii) no contrast uptake in the aortic lesion on the first pass angiographic run; (iii) no contrast uptake in the aortic lesion on the equilibrium phase T1 sequence. On each patient's diagnostic and follow up imaging studies, the volume of (i) false lumen/IMH, (ii) total aorta, and (iii) true lumen were calculated. Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the evolution of these volumes according to the presence or absence of the aforementioned criteria were compared. Results: Of 39 patients, in seven all MRI criteria were positive (group IMH) and 32 had one or more negative criteria (group AD). Patients with IMH and AD were similar with respect to sex, age, and delay between onset of symptoms and diagnostic and follow up imaging studies. Eighteen patients had a follow up imaging study after a mean period of 11.2 months: six in the IMH group and 12 in the AD group. Lesion volume decrease and relative true lumen volume increase were statistically significant in group IMH (p =.046 and p =.046, respectively), whereas there was a statistically significant increase of lesion volume (p =.008) in the AD group. Conclusion: This pilot study proposed three simple MRI criteria to differentiate between AD and IMH. Once prospectively and clinically validated, this could have substantial therapeutic benefits as IMH are likely to heal spontaneously.
KW - Acute aortic syndrome
KW - Aortic dissection
KW - Aortic remodeling
KW - Intramural haematoma
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055452007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055452007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 30377034
AN - SCOPUS:85055452007
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 57
SP - 350
EP - 359
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -