Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: Analysis of a COVID-19 observational registry for a diverse US metropolitan population

Jonika Tannous, Alan P. Pan, Thomas Potter, Abdulaziz T. Bako, Katharine Dlouhy, Ashley Drews, Henry Dirk Sostman, Farhaan S. Vahidy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives We evaluated the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). Design and setting A retrospective cohort study using a COVID-19 specific, electronic medical record-based surveillance and outcomes registry from an eight-hospital tertiary hospital system in the Houston metropolitan area. Analyses were replicated across a global research network database. Participants We identified adult (≥18) patients with PASC. PASC was defined as experiencing constitutional (palpitations, malaise/fatigue, headache) or systemic (sleep disorder, shortness of breath, mood/anxiety disorders, cough and cognitive impairment) symptoms beyond the 28-day postinfection period. Statistical analysis We fit multivariable logistic regression models and report estimated likelihood of PASC associated with vaccination or mAb treatment as adjusted ORs with 95% CIs. Results Primary analyses included 53 239 subjects (54.9% female), of whom 5929, 11.1% (95% CI 10.9% to 11.4%), experienced PASC. Both vaccinated breakthrough cases (vs unvaccinated) and mAb-treated patients (vs untreated) had lower likelihoods for developing PASC, aOR (95% CI): 0.58 (0.52-0.66), and 0.77 (0.69-0.86), respectively. Vaccination was associated with decreased odds of developing all constitutional and systemic symptoms except for taste and smell changes. For all symptoms, vaccination was associated with lower likelihood of experiencing PASC compared with mAb treatment. Replication analysis found identical frequency of PASC (11.2%, 95% CI 11.1 to 11.3) and similar protective effects against PASC for the COVID-19 vaccine: 0.25 (0.21-0.30) and mAb treatment: 0.62 (0.59-0.66). Conclusion Although both COVID-19 vaccines and mAbs decreased the likelihood of PASC, vaccination remains the most effective tool for the prevention of long-term consequences of COVID-19.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere067611
Pages (from-to)e067611
JournalBMJ open
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 5 2023

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Epidemiology
  • Public health
  • Humans
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Disease Progression
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome/drug therapy
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Adult
  • Female
  • COVID-19/prevention & control
  • Registries
  • Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: Analysis of a COVID-19 observational registry for a diverse US metropolitan population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this