The effect of complement C3 or C5 inhibition on geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A living systematic review and meta-analysis

Anubhav Garg, Keean Nanji, Felicia Tai, Mark Phillips, Dena Zeraatkar, Sunir J. Garg, Srini Vas R. Sadda, Peter K. Kaiser, Robyn H. Guymer, Sobha Sivaprasad, Charles C. Wykoff, Varun Chaudhary

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

With the introduction of therapies to treat geographic atrophy (GA), GA management in clinical practice is now possible. A living systematic review can provide access to timely and robust evidence synthesis. This review found that complement factor 3 and 5 (C3 and C5) inhibition compared to sham likely reduces change in square root GA area at 12 months and untransformed GA area at 24 months. There is likely little to no difference in the rate of systemic treatment-emergent adverse events compared to sham. C3 and C5 inhibition, however, likely does not improve best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months, and the evidence is uncertain regarding change in BCVA at 24 months. Higher rates of ocular treatment emergent adverse effects with complement inhibition occur at 12 months and likely at 24 months. Complement inhibition likely results in new onset neovascular age-related macular degeneration at 12 months. This living meta-analysis will continuously incorporate new evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-361
Number of pages13
JournalSurvey of Ophthalmology
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Keywords

  • Age-related macular degeneration
  • Avacincaptad pegol
  • C3
  • C5
  • Complement
  • Eculizumab
  • Geographic atrophy
  • Living systematic review
  • Meta-analysis
  • Pegcetacoplan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of complement C3 or C5 inhibition on geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A living systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this