Contextual information in medicolegal death investigation decision-making: Manner of death determination for cases of a single gunshot wound

Itiel E. Dror, Dwayne A. Wolf, Garrett Phillips, Si Gao, Yijiong Yang, Stacy A. Drake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

To explore the role of contextual information in determining manner of death, four cases involving single gunshot wounds were presented to participants (n = 252) involved in medicolegal death investigation. The participants received identical autopsy information but different contextual information. The data demonstrated that participants tended to rely on contextual information more than autopsy information: In the suicide context, participants across the four cases reached 153 final decisions of suicide (and 25 of homicide), whereas in the homicide context, participants reached only 10 final decisions of suicide (and 181 of homicide) –all while examining identical autopsy information. The impact of the contextual information was so powerful that many participants changed initial autopsy-based conclusions to align with the contextual information. Given the significant role and impact that contextual information has on expert decision making, one must consider what, how, and when contextual information should be used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100285
JournalForensic Science International: Synergy
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022

Keywords

  • Cognitive bias
  • Contextual information
  • Forensic pathology
  • Forensic science
  • Manner of death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contextual information in medicolegal death investigation decision-making: Manner of death determination for cases of a single gunshot wound'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this