TY - JOUR
T1 - Hamstring Autograft Versus Hybrid Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
T2 - A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies
AU - Sochacki, Kyle R.
AU - McCulloch, Patrick C.
AU - Lintner, David M.
AU - Harris, Joshua D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: P.C.M. receives research support from Arthrex and DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company; serves on the editorial or governing board of Journal of Knee Surgery and Orthobullets.com; and is a paid presenter or speaker for Vericel. J.D.H. is a board or committee member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America; is on the editorial or governing board of Arthroscopy and Frontiers in Surgery; receives research support from DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company; is a paid consultant for NIA Magellan; is a paid consultant and paid presenter for Ossur; receives publishing royalties from SLACK; and is a paid consultant and paid presenter for and receives research support from Smith and Nephew. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material. The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: P.C.M. receives research support from Arthrex and DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company; serves on the editorial or governing board of Journal of Knee Surgery and Orthobullets.com; and is a paid presenter or speaker for Vericel. J.D.H. is a board or committee member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America; is on the editorial or governing board of Arthroscopy and Frontiers in Surgery; receives research support from DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company; is a paid consultant for NIA Magellan; is a paid consultant and paid presenter for Ossur; receives publishing royalties from SLACK; and is a paid consultant and paid presenter for and receives research support from Smith and Nephew. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Purpose: To compare (1) patient-reported outcomes, (2) objective knee measures of stability, (3) failures, and (4) reoperations after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autograft versus autograft-allograft hybrid grafts. Methods: We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies that compared outcomes of ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autograft versus autograft-allograft hybrid grafts in adult human patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Knee-specific patient-reported outcome scores, objective knee measures of stability, failures, and reoperations were reported for each study and compared between semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and hybrid grafts. Study heterogeneity and levels of evidence precluded meta-analysis. Results: We analyzed 6 articles (544 patients; 54.5% male patients; mean age, 30.9 ± 3.9 years; mean follow-up period, 43.6 ± 15.5 months). Of 6 studies, 4 showed no significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores between the semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and hybrid groups. Five of six studies showed no significant differences in KT-1000 measurements between groups. The risk of ACL failure ranged from 3.2% to 8.4% for semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and from 2.4% to 14.3% for hybrid grafts, with no study reporting a significant difference in failure rates between groups. The reoperation rate in the subjects undergoing ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and hybrid grafts ranged from 2.8% to 10.3% and from 2.4% to 48.3%, respectively. In 5 of 6 studies, no significant differences in reoperation rates were found between groups. Conclusions: Most studies reported no significant differences in patient-reported outcome scores, objective knee measures of stability, and reoperation rates between semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and hybrid grafts. No significant difference in ACL failure rates was found between groups in any study. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies.
AB - Purpose: To compare (1) patient-reported outcomes, (2) objective knee measures of stability, (3) failures, and (4) reoperations after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autograft versus autograft-allograft hybrid grafts. Methods: We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies that compared outcomes of ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autograft versus autograft-allograft hybrid grafts in adult human patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. Knee-specific patient-reported outcome scores, objective knee measures of stability, failures, and reoperations were reported for each study and compared between semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and hybrid grafts. Study heterogeneity and levels of evidence precluded meta-analysis. Results: We analyzed 6 articles (544 patients; 54.5% male patients; mean age, 30.9 ± 3.9 years; mean follow-up period, 43.6 ± 15.5 months). Of 6 studies, 4 showed no significant differences in International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores between the semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and hybrid groups. Five of six studies showed no significant differences in KT-1000 measurements between groups. The risk of ACL failure ranged from 3.2% to 8.4% for semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and from 2.4% to 14.3% for hybrid grafts, with no study reporting a significant difference in failure rates between groups. The reoperation rate in the subjects undergoing ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and hybrid grafts ranged from 2.8% to 10.3% and from 2.4% to 48.3%, respectively. In 5 of 6 studies, no significant differences in reoperation rates were found between groups. Conclusions: Most studies reported no significant differences in patient-reported outcome scores, objective knee measures of stability, and reoperation rates between semitendinosus-gracilis autografts and hybrid grafts. No significant difference in ACL failure rates was found between groups in any study. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064912987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064912987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.070
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.070
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31053462
AN - SCOPUS:85064912987
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 35
SP - 1905
EP - 1913
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 6
ER -